<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>I.J. Sansom</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>J.E. Repetski</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>M.P. Smith</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1996</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The first description of&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Anatolepis&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;Bockelie &amp;amp; Fortey was from early Ordovician sediments of Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1,2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;, but the genus is now known from many localities in North America and Greenland, ranging in age from the Late Cambrian period to the Early Ordovician&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3–6&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;. Although initially interpreted as an agnathan fish&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2,3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;that predated other representatives&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;7&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;, this has been widely disputed because the available histological data were unconvincing&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;6,8–10&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;and the scales fell outside the known morpho-logical range of other accepted early vertebrates&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;9–11&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;. Further doubt was cast upon the vertebrate affinity of&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Anatolepis&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;when specimens from East Greenland were interpreted as the cuticular fragments of aglaspid arthropods&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;6&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;, although this interpretation has also been refuted&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;12&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;. Here we report on the morphology and histology of large collections of&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Anatolepis&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;, and demonstrate the presence of dentine, a tissue unique to vertebrates, confirming that the taxon is both a vertebrate and the oldest known fish.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1038/380702a0</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Springer Nature</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Histology of the first fish</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>