<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>C.C. Grant</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>A. Ross</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>B.R. Julian</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>G.R. Foulger</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1997</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div class=""&gt;&lt;div class="article-section__content en main"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Industrial exploitation is causing clearly-measurable changes in Earth structure at The Geysers geothermal area, California. Production at The Geysers peaked in the late 1980s at ∼3.5 × 10³ kg s&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;of steam and 1800 MW of electricity. It subsequently decreased by about 10% per year [&lt;i&gt;Barker et al.&lt;/i&gt;, 1992] because of declining reservoir pressure. The steam reservoir coincides with a strong negative anomaly (∼0.16, ∼9%) in the compressional-to-shear seismic wave speed ratio&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;V&lt;sub&gt;P&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;/&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;V&lt;sub&gt;S&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, consistent with the expected effects of low-pressure vapor-phase pore fluid [&lt;i&gt;Julian et al.&lt;/i&gt;, 1996]. Between 1991 and 1994 this anomaly increased in amplitude by up to about 0.07 (∼4%). This is consistent with the expected effects of continued pressure reduction and conversion of pore water to steam as a result of exploitation. These unique results show that&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;V&lt;sub&gt;P&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;/&lt;i&gt;V&lt;sub&gt;S&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;tomography can easily detect saturation changes caused by exploitation of reservoirs, and is a potentially valuable technique for monitoring environmental change. They also provide geophysical observational evidence that geothermal energy is not a renewable energy source.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1029/96GL03152</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>American Geophysical Union</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Industrially induced changes in Earth structure at the geysers geothermal area, California</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>