<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>C.E. Barker</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1996</dc:date>
  <dc:description>A comparison of mean-random vitrinite reflectance (R(v-r)) values calculated from measurements on polished whole-rock and on concentrates of dispersed organic matter (DOM) mounts of the same samples generally show little difference. Compared to measurements on DOM mounts, R(v-r) measurements by the same microscopist on corresponding whole-rock samples are up to a few tenths of a percent lower over the range of 0.6-3.2% R(v-r) and have a slightly higher standard deviation. Whole-rock mounts have an advantage over DOM mounts in the identification of first-cycle vitrinite and differentiation of solid bitumen from vitrinite.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/0146-6380(96)00022-8</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:title>A comparison of vitrinite reflectance measurements made on whole-rock and dispersed organic matter concentrate mounts</dc:title>
  <dc:type>text</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>