<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Marilyn P. Anderson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>V. A. Kelson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>R. J. Hunt</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1998</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div class="abstract-group "&gt;&lt;div class="article-section__content en main"&gt;&lt;p&gt;This paper demonstrates that analytic element models have potential as powerful screening tools that can facilitate or improve calibration of more complicated finite-difference and finite-element models. We demonstrate how a two-dimensional analytic element model was used to identify errors in a complex three-dimensional finite-difference model caused by incorrect specification of boundary conditions. An improved finite-difference model was developed using boundary conditions developed from a far-field analytic element model. Calibration of a revised finite-difference model was achieved using fewer zones of hydraulic conductivity and lake bed conductance than the original finite-difference model. Calibration statistics were also improved in that simulated base-flows were much closer to measured values. The improved calibration is due mainly to improved specification of the boundary conditions made possible by first solving the far-field problem with an analytic element model.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb02108.x</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>National Groundwater Association</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Improving a complex finite-difference ground water flow model through the use of an analytic element screening model</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>