<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Jerry R. Choate</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>M.A. Bogan</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Terry L. Yates</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>E.W. Valdez</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1999</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;The taxonomic status of the Arizona myotis (&lt;i&gt;Myotis occultus&lt;/i&gt;) is uncertain. Although the taxon was described as a distinct species and currently is regarded as such by some authors, others have noted what they interpreted as intergradation with the little brown bat (&lt;i&gt;M.&lt;/i&gt; &lt;i&gt;lucifugus carissima&lt;/i&gt;) near the Colorado-New Mexico state line. In this study, we used protein electrophoresis to compare bats of these nominal taxa. We examined 20 loci from 142 specimens referable to &lt;i&gt;M. occultus&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;M. lucifugus&lt;/i&gt; from New Mexico, Colorado, and Wyoming. Nine of the 20 loci were polymorphic. Results show that there were high similarities among samples, no fixed alleles, and minor divergence from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Our results suggest that the two nominal taxa represent only one species and that &lt;i&gt;M. occultus&lt;/i&gt; should be regarded as a subspecies of &lt;i&gt;M. lucifugus&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.2307/1383300</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Oxford Academic</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Taxonomic status of &lt;i&gt;Myotis occultus&lt;/i&gt;</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>