<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>M.D. Sobsey</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>F. W. Schaefer III</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>D.S. Francy</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Rebecca A. Nally</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>C.D. Heaney</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>O. D. Simmons III</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2001</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;To improve surveillance for&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Cryptosporidium&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;oocysts in water, the US Environmental Protection Agency developed method 1622, which consists of filtration, concentration, immunomagnetic separation, fluorescent antibody and 4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) counter-staining, and microscopic evaluation. Two filters were compared for analysis of 11 stream water samples collected throughout the United States. Replicate 10-L stream water samples (unspiked and spiked with 100–250 oocysts) were tested to evaluate matrix effects. Oocyst recoveries from the stream water samples averaged 22% (standard deviation [SD] = ±17%) with a membrane disk and 12% (SD = ±6%) with a capsule filter. Oocyst recoveries from reagent water precision and recovery samples averaged 39% (SD = ±13%) with a membrane disk and 47% (SD = ±19%) with a capsule filter. These results demonstrate that&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Cryptosporidium&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;oocysts can be recovered from stream waters using method 1622, but recoveries are lower than those from reagent-grade water. This research also evaluated concentrations of indicator bacteria in the stream water samples. Because few samples were oocyst-positive, relationships between detections of oocysts and concentrations of indicator organisms could not be determined.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1002/j.1551-8833.2001.tb09101.x</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>American Water Works Association</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Evaluation of USEPA method 1622 for detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in stream waters</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>