<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Ilse Storch</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>J.A. Bissonnette</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2002</dc:date>
  <dc:description>In this paper, we briefly discuss some of the fundamental problems arising from the inherent complexity of larger-scale ecological systems. We examine the tenuous assumption of a direct correspondence between ecological data and theory, we comment on a recent report that evaluated the efficacy of fragmentation experiments, and we briefly assess its implications for ecological research and conservation practice on the landscape scale.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.5751/ES-00415-060214</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>The Resilience Alliance</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Fragmentation: Is the message clear?</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>