<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>C. Teague</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>P. Lilleboe</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>R. Cheng</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>J. Gartner</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Rizoli J.A.</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>D. Barrick</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2003</dc:date>
  <dc:description>From the velocity profiles across the river, estimates of total volume flow for the four methods were calculated based on a knowledge of the bottom depth vs position across the river. It was found that the flow comparisons for the American River were much closer, within 2% of each other among all of the methods. Sources of positional biases and anomalies in the RiverSonde measurement patterns along the river were identified and discussed.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:title>Profiling river surface velocities and volume flow estimation with bistatic UHF RiverSonde radar</dc:title>
  <dc:type>text</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>