<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>M.V. Mathes</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>K.E. Hyer</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>C. Hagedorn</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>H. Kator</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>J. Lukasik</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>T. L. O’Brien</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>T.W. Fenger</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>M. Samadpour</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>K.M. Strickler</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>B.A. Wiggins</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>D. M. Stoeckel</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2004</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Microbial source tracking (MST) uses various approaches to classify fecal-indicator microorganisms to source hosts. Reproducibility, accuracy, and robustness of seven phenotypic and genotypic MST protocols were evaluated by use of Escherichia coli from an eight-host library of known-source isolates and a separate, blinded challenge library. In reproducibility tests, measuring each protocol's ability to reclassify blinded replicates, only one (pulsed-field gel electrophoresis; PFGE) correctly classified all test replicates to host species; three protocols classified 48-62% correctly, and the remaining three classified fewer than 25% correctly. In accuracy tests, measuring each protocol's ability to correctly classify new isolates, ribotyping with EcoRI and PvuII approached 100% correct classification but only 6% of isolates were classified; four of the other six protocols (antibiotic resistance analysis, PFGE, and two repetitive-element PCR protocols) achieved better than random accuracy rates when 30-100% of challenge isolates were classified. In robustness tests, measuring each protocol's ability to recognize isolates from nonlibrary hosts, three protocols correctly classified 33-100% of isolates as "unknown origin," whereas four protocols classified all isolates to a source category. A relevance test, summarizing interpretations for a hypothetical water sample containing 30 challenge isolates, indicated that false-positive classifications would hinder interpretations for most protocols. Study results indicate that more representation in known-source libraries and better classification accuracy would be needed before field application. Thorough reliability assessment of classification results is crucial before and during application of MST protocols.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1021/es0354519</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:title>Comparison of seven protocols to identify fecal contamination sources using Escherichia coli</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>