<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>S. L. Finkbeiner</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Douglas H. Johnson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>T. Allen</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2004</dc:date>
  <dc:description>We compared detection rates of passive and playback breeding bird survey techniques on elusive marsh birds - Pied-billed Grebe (Podilymbus podiceps), American Bittern (Botaurus lentiginosus), Least Bittern (Ixobrychus exilis), Virginia Rail (Rallus limicola), and Sora (Porzana carolina) - during a two-year study at Lacreek National Wildlife Refuge, in southwestern South Dakota. We conducted 151 passive point counts followed by playback-response surveys at the same points in marsh-bird habitat on the refuge. Playback surveys detected secretive water birds more frequently than our passive surveys, increasing rates for each species by factors of 2.4 to 7.0. The distance a bird was detected from a point varied with the species and the survey technique.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1675/1524-4695(2004)027[0277:CODROB]2.0.CO;2</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>The Waterbird Society</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Comparison of detection rates of breeding marsh birds in passive and playback surveys at Lacreek National Wildlife Refuge, South Dakota</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>