<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>J.A. Davis</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>G.R. Lumpkin</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>R. Chisari</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>T.D. Waite</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>T.E. Payne</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2004</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div id="abstracts" class="Abstracts"&gt;&lt;div id="aep-abstract-id13" class="abstract author"&gt;&lt;div id="aep-abstract-sec-id14"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The&amp;nbsp;adsorption&amp;nbsp;of uranyl on standard Georgia kaolinites (KGa-1 and KGa-1B) was studied as a function of pH (3–10), total U (1 and 10 μmol/l), and mass loading of clay (4 and 40 g/l). The uptake of uranyl in air-equilibrated systems increased with pH and reached a maximum in the near-neutral pH range. At higher pH values, the&amp;nbsp;sorption&amp;nbsp;decreased due to the presence of aqueous uranyl carbonate complexes. One&amp;nbsp;kaolinite&amp;nbsp;sample was examined after the uranyl uptake experiments by&amp;nbsp;transmission electron microscopy&amp;nbsp;(TEM), using energy dispersive&amp;nbsp;X-ray spectroscopy&amp;nbsp;(EDS) to determine the U content. It was found that&amp;nbsp;uraniumwas preferentially adsorbed by Ti-rich impurity phases (predominantly anatase), which are present in the kaolinite samples. Uranyl sorption on the Georgia kaolinites was simulated with U sorption reactions on both titanol and aluminol sites, using a simple non-electrostatic surface&amp;nbsp;complexation&amp;nbsp;model (SCM). The relative amounts of U-binding &amp;gt;TiOH and &amp;gt;AlOH sites were estimated from the TEM/EDS results. A ternary uranyl carbonate complex on the titanol site improved the fit to the experimental data in the higher pH range. The final model contained only three optimised log&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;K&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;values, and was able to simulate adsorption data across a wide range of experimental conditions. The &amp;gt;TiOH (anatase) sites appear to play an important role in retaining U at low uranyl concentrations. As kaolinite often contains trace TiO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;, its presence may need to be taken into account when modelling the results of sorption experiments with&amp;nbsp;radionuclides&amp;nbsp;or&amp;nbsp;trace metals&amp;nbsp;on kaolinite.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clay.2003.08.013</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Surface complexation model of uranyl sorption on Georgia kaolinite</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>