<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>L.D. Mech</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2006</dc:date>
  <dc:description>I compared 101 wolf (Canis lupus) pack territories formed in Wisconsin during 1993-2004 to the logistic regression predictive model of Mladenoff et al. (1995, 1997, 1999). Of these, 60% were located in putative habitat suitabilities &lt;50%, including 22% in suitabilities of 0-9%. About a third of the area with putative suitabilities &gt;50% remained unoccupied by known packs after 24 years of recolonization. This model was a poor predictor of wolf re-colonizing locations in Wisconsin, apparently because it failed to consider the adaptability of wolves. Such models should be used cautiously in wolf-management or restoration plans.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[874:PFOAWL]2.0.CO;2</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:title>Prediction failure of a wolf landscape model</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>