<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>R.L. Brown</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>J.P. Castagna</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Chen Hao</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2005</dc:date>
  <dc:description>A theoretical comparison is made of PP and PS angle-dependent reflection coefficients at the top of two fractured-reservoir models using exact, general, anisotropic reflection coefficients. The two vertical-fracture models are taken to have the same total crack density. The primary issue investigated is determination of the fracture orientation using azimuthal AVO analysis. The first model represents a single-fracture set and the second model has an additional fracture set oblique to the first set at an angle of 60??. As expected, the PP-wave anisotropy is reduced when multiple fracture sets are present, making the determination of orientation more difficult than for the case of a single-fracture set. Long offsets are required for identification of dominant fracture orientations using PP-wave AVO. PS-wave AVO, however, is quite sensitive to fracture orientations, even at short offsets. For multiple-fracture sets, PS signals can potentially be used to determine orientations of the individual sets. ?? 2005 Society of Exploration Geophysicists. All rights reserved.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1190/1.1884825</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:title>AVO for one- and two-fracture set models</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>