<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>A. J. Sutton</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>T. Elias</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>M.P. Doukas</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>T.M. Gerlach</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>K.A. McGee</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2006</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p class="Para"&gt;We report the results of two soil CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; efflux surveys by the closed chamber circulation method at the Puhimau thermal area in the upper East Rift Zone (ERZ) of Kilauea&amp;nbsp;volcano, Hawaii. The surveys were undertaken in 1996 and 1998 to constrain how much CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; might be reaching the ERZ after degassing beneath the summit caldera and whether the Puhimau thermal area might be a significant contributor to the overall CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; budget of Kilauea. The area was revisited in 2001 to determine the effects of surface disturbance on efflux values by the collar emplacement technique utilized in the earlier surveys. Utilizing a cutoff value of 50 g m&lt;sup&gt;−2&lt;/sup&gt; d&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt; for the surrounding forest background efflux, the CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; emission rates for the anomaly at Puhimau thermal area were 27 t d&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt; in 1996 and 17 t d&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt; in 1998. Water vapor was removed before analysis in all cases in order to obtain CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; values on a dry air basis and mitigate the effect of water vapor dilution on the measurements. It is clear that Puhimau thermal area is not a significant contributor to Kilauea's&amp;nbsp;CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; output and that most of Kilauea's&amp;nbsp;CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; (8500 t d&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;) is degassed at the summit, leaving only magma with its remaining stored volatiles, such as SO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;, for injection down the ERZ. Because of the low CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; emission rate and the presence of a shallow water table in the upper ERZ that effectively scrubs SO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; and other acid gases, Puhimau thermal area currently does not appear to be generally well suited for observing temporal changes in degassing at&amp;nbsp;Kilauea.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1007/s00024-006-0036-z</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Springer</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Puhimau thermal area: a window into the upper east rift zone of Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii?</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>