<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>T. Yoshinari</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>R. L. Smith</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2008</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div class="hlFld-Abstract"&gt;&lt;div id="abstractBox"&gt;&lt;p class="articleBody_abstractText"&gt;Little is known about nitric oxide (NO) production or consumption in the subsurface, an environment which may be conducive to NO accumulation. A study conducted in a nitrogen-contaminated aquifer on Cape Cod, Massachusetts assessed the occurrence and turnover of NO within a contaminant plume in which nitrification and denitrification were known to occur. NO (up to 8.6 nM) was detected in restricted vertical zones located within a nitrate (NO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−&lt;/sup&gt;) gradient and characterized by low dissolved oxygen (&amp;lt;10 μM). NO concentrations correlated best with nitrite (NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−&lt;/sup&gt;) (up to 35 μM), but nitrous oxide (N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O) (up to 1 μM) also was present. Single-well injection tests were used to determine NO production and consumption in situ within these zones. First-order rate constants for NO consumption were similar (0.05−0.08 h&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;) at high and low (260 and 10 nM) NO concentrations, suggesting a turnover time at in situ concentrations of 10−20 h. Tracer tests with&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;15&lt;/sup&gt;N[NO] demonstrated that oxidation to&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;15&lt;/sup&gt;N[NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−&lt;/sup&gt;] occurred only during the initial stages, but after 4 h reduction to&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;15&lt;/sup&gt;N[N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O] was the primary reaction product. Added NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;(31 μM) or NO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;(53 μM) resulted in a linear NO accumulation at 2.4 and 1.0 nM h&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;for the first 6 h of in situ tests. These results suggest that NO was primarily produced by denitrification within this aquifer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="hlFld-Fulltext"&gt;&lt;br data-mce-bogus="1"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1021/es801290v</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>ACS</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Occurrence and turnover of nitric oxide in a nitrogen-impacted sand and gravel aquifer</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>