<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Bernhard Mayer</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Myron J. Mitchell</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Scott W. Bailey</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>James B. Shanley</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2008</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Stable sulfur (S) isotope ratios can be used to identify the sources of sulfate contributing to streamwater. We collected weekly and high-flow stream samples for S isotopic analysis of sulfate through the entire water year 2003 plus the snowmelt period of 2004. The study area was the 41-ha forested W-9 catchment at Sleepers River Research Watershed, Vermont, a site known to produce sulfate from weathering of sulfide minerals in the bedrock. The&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;&amp;delta;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;34&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;S values of streamwater sulfate followed an annual sinusoidal pattern ranging from about 6.5&amp;permil; in early spring to about 10&amp;permil; in early fall. During high-flow events,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;&amp;delta;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;34&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;S values typically decreased by 1 to 3&amp;permil; from the prevailing seasonal value. The isotopic evidence suggests that stream sulfate concentrations are controlled by: (1) an overall dominance of bedrock-derived sulfate (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;&amp;delta;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;34&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;S ~&amp;nbsp;6&amp;ndash;14&amp;permil;); (2) contributions of pedogenic sulfate (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;&amp;delta;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;34&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;S ~&amp;nbsp;5&amp;ndash;6&amp;permil;) during snowmelt and storms with progressively diminishing contributions during base flow recession; and (3) minor effects of dissimilatory bacterial sulfate reduction and subsequent reoxidation of sulfides. Bedrock should not be overlooked as a source of S in catchment sulfate budgets.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.03.020</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Seasonal and event variations in  δ&lt;sup&gt;34&lt;/sup&gt;S values of stream sulfate in a Vermont forested catchment: Implications for sulfur sources and cycling</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>