<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Laurie Johnson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Richard Bernknopf</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Anne Wein</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2011</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Recovery from an earthquake like the M7.8 ShakeOut Scenario will be a major endeavor taking many years to complete. Hundreds of Southern California municipalities will be affected; most lack recovery plans or previous disaster experience. To support recovery planning this paper 1) extends the regional ShakeOut Scenario analysis into the recovery period using a recovery model, 2) localizes analyses to identify longer-term impacts and issues in two communities, and 3) considers the regional context of local recovery.Key community insights about preparing for post-disaster recovery include the need to: geographically diversify city procurement; set earthquake mitigation priorities for critical infrastructure (e.g., airport), plan to replace mobile homes with earthquake safety measures, consider post-earthquake redevelopment opportunities ahead of time, and develop post-disaster recovery management and governance structures. This work also showed that communities with minor damages are still sensitive to regional infrastructure damages and their potential long-term impacts on community recovery. This highlights the importance of community and infrastructure resilience strategies as well.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1193/1.3581225</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Earthquake Engineering Research Institute</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Recovering from the ShakeOut earthquake</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>