<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>David A. Clague</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Iain D.E. Faichney</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Paul D. Fullagar</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>James R. Hein</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>James G. Moore</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Charles K. Paull</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Jody M. Webster</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2010</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;A sequence of submerged terraces (L1&amp;ndash;L12) offshore Lanai was previously interpreted as reefal, and correlated with a similar series of reef terraces offshore Hawaii island, whose ages are known to be &amp;lt;500&amp;nbsp;ka. We present bathymetric, observational, lithologic and 51&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;87&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;Sr/&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;86&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;Sr isotopic measurements for the submerged Lanai terraces ranging from &amp;minus;300 to &amp;minus;1000&amp;nbsp;m (L3&amp;ndash;L12) that indicate that these terraces are drowned reef systems that grew in shallow coral reef to intermediate and deeper fore-reef slope settings since the early Pleistocene. Age estimates based on&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;87&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;Sr/&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;86&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;Sr isotopic measurements on corals, coralline algae, echinoids, and bulk sediments, although lacking the precision (&amp;sim;&amp;plusmn;0.23&amp;nbsp;Ma) to distinguish the age&amp;ndash;depth relationship and drowning times of individual reefs, indicate that the L12&amp;ndash;L3 reefs range in age from &amp;sim;1.3&amp;ndash;0.5&amp;nbsp;Ma and are therefore about 0.5&amp;ndash;0.8&amp;nbsp;Ma older than the corresponding reefs around the flanks of Hawaii. These new age data, despite their lack of precision and the influence of later-stage submarine diagenesis on some analyzed corals, clearly revise the previous correlations between the reefs off Lanai and Hawaii. Soon after the end of major shield building (&amp;sim;1.3&amp;ndash;1.2&amp;nbsp;Ma), the Lanai reefs initiated growth and went through a period of rapid subsidence and reef drowning associated with glacial/interglacial cycles similar to that experienced by the Hawaii reefs. However, their early Pleistocene initiation means they experienced a longer, more complex growth history than their Hawaii counterparts.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.epsl.2009.12.029</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier Science</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Early Pleistocene origin of reefs around Lanai, Hawaii</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>