<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>T.R. Hrabik</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>D.L. Yule</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>J.D. Stockwell</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>A.E. Gamble</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2011</dc:date>
  <dc:description>We use detailed diet analyses of the predominant planktivorous, benthivorous and piscivorous fish species from Lake Superior to create a nearshore (bathymetric depths &lt; 80 m) fish community food web. The food web was based on analysis of 5125 fish stomachs collected seasonally (spring, summer, fall) from 9 nearshore sites in 2005. Based on mass of prey items, nearshore diets across all sites and seasons were similarly structured with a dominance of macroinvertebrates (&lt;i&gt;Mysis diluviana&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Diporeia&lt;/i&gt; spp). Although the piscivorous fishes like lean lake trout (&lt;i&gt;Salvelinus namaycush&lt;/i&gt;) fed to a lesser extent on &lt;i&gt;Diporeia&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Mysis&lt;/i&gt;, they were still strongly connected to these macroinvertebrates, which were consumed by their primary prey species (sculpin spp., rainbow smelt &lt;i&gt;Osmerus mordax&lt;/i&gt;, and coregonines). The addition of &lt;i&gt;Bythotrephes&lt;/i&gt; to summer/fall cisco and lake whitefish diets, and the decrease in rainbow smelt in lean lake trout diets (replaced by coregonines) were the largest observed differences relative to historic Lake Superior diet studies. Although the offshore food web of Lake Superior was simpler than nearshore in terms of number of fish species present, the two areas had remarkably similar food web structures, and both fish communities were primarily supported by &lt;i&gt;Mysis&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Diporeia&lt;/i&gt;. We conclude that declines in &lt;i&gt;Mysis&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;Diporeia&lt;/i&gt; populations would have a significant impact on energy flow in Lake Superior. The food web information we generated can be used to better identify management strategies for Lake Superior.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jglr.2011.06.008</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Trophic connections in Lake Superior Part II: the nearshore fish community</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>