<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>J.D. Wickham</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>L. Fattorini</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>T.D. Wade</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>F. Baffetta</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>J.H. Smith</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>S.V. Stehman</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2009</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Land-cover maps are often used to compute land-cover composition (i.e., the proportion or percent of area covered by each class), for each unit in a spatial partition of the region mapped. We derive design-based estimators of mean deviation (MD), mean absolute deviation (MAD), root mean square error (RMSE), and correlation (CORR) to quantify accuracy of land-cover composition for a general two-stage cluster sampling design, and for the special case of simple random sampling without replacement (SRSWOR) at each stage. The bias of the estimators for the two-stage SRSWOR design is evaluated via a simulation study. The estimators of RMSE and CORR have small bias except when sample size is small and the land-cover class is rare. The estimator of MAD is biased for both rare and common land-cover classes except when sample size is large. A general recommendation is that rare land-cover classes require large sample sizes to ensure that the accuracy estimators have small bias. ?? 2009 Elsevier Inc.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.rse.2009.02.011</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:title>Estimating accuracy of land-cover composition from two-stage cluster sampling</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>