<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>T. S. Collett</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Myung W. Lee</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2009</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Gas hydrate stability conditions restrict the occurrence of gas hydrate to unconsolidated and high water-content sediments at shallow depths. Because of these host sediments properties, seismic and well log data acquired for the detection of free gas and associated gas hydrate-bearing sediments often require nonconventional analysis. For example, a conventional method of identifying free gas using the compressional/shear-wave velocity (V&lt;sub&gt;p&lt;/sub&gt;/V&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt;) ratio at the logging frequency will not work, unless the free-gas saturations are more than about 40%. The P-wave velocity dispersion of partially gas-saturated sediments causes a problem in interpreting well log velocities and seismic data. Using the White, J.E. [1975. Computed seismic speeds and attenuation in rocks with partial gas saturation. Geophysics 40, 224-232] model for partially gas-saturated sediments, the difference between well log and seismic velocities can be reconciled. The inclusion of P-wave velocity dispersion in interpreting well log data is, therefore, essential to identify free gas and to tie surface seismic data to synthetic seismograms.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2008.07.009</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:title>Unique problems associated with seismic analysis of partially gas-saturated unconsolidated sediments</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>