<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>M.R. Turetsky</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>J. M. Waddington</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>J.W. Harden</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>A. D. McGuire</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>M.R. Chivers</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2009</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Peatlands store 30% of the world's terrestrial soil carbon (C) and those located at northern latitudes are expected to experience rapid climate warming. We monitored growing season carbon dioxide (CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;) fluxes across a factorial design of in situ water table (control, drought, and flooded plots) and soil warming (control vs. warming via open top chambers) treatments for 2 years in a rich fen located just outside the Bonanza Creek Experimental Forest in interior Alaska. The drought (lowered water table position) treatment was a weak sink or small source of atmospheric CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; compared to the moderate atmospheric CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; sink at our control. This change in net ecosystem exchange was due to lower gross primary production and light-saturated photosynthesis rather than increased ecosystem respiration. The flooded (raised water table position) treatment was a greater CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; sink in 2006 due largely to increased early season gross primary production and higher light-saturated photosynthesis. Although flooding did not have substantial effects on rates of ecosystem respiration, this water table treatment had lower maximum respiration rates and a higher temperature sensitivity of ecosystem respiration than the control plot. Surface soil warming increased both ecosystem respiration and gross primary production by approximately 16% compared to control (ambient temperature) plots, with no net effect on net ecosystem exchange. Results from this rich fen manipulation suggest that fast responses to drought will include reduced ecosystem C storage driven by plant stress, whereas inundation will increase ecosystem C storage by stimulating plant growth. ?? 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1007/s10021-009-9292-y</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:title>Effects of experimental water table and temperature manipulations on ecosystem CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; fluxes in an Alaskan rich fen</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>