<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>C. Gonzalez</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>N. Teigell</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Terry Petrosky</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>D.E. Northup</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>M. Lyles</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Dale W. Griffin</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2011</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The influence of sample-collection-time on the recovery of culturable airborne microorganisms using a low-flow-rate membrane-filtration unit and a high-flow-rate liquid impinger were investigated. Differences in recoveries were investigated in four different atmospheric environments, one mid-oceanic at an altitude of ~10.0&amp;nbsp;m, one on a mountain top at an altitude of ~3,000.0&amp;nbsp;m, one at ~1.0&amp;nbsp;m altitude in Tallahassee, Florida, and one at ~1.0&amp;nbsp;m above ground in a subterranean-cave. Regarding use of membrane filtration, a common trend was observed: the shorter the collection period, the higher the recovery of culturable bacteria and fungi. These data also demonstrated that lower culturable counts were common in the more remote mid-oceanic and mountain-top atmospheric environments with bacteria, fungi, and total numbers averaging (by sample time or method categories) &amp;lt;3.0 colony-forming units (CFU) m&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;. At the Florida and subterranean sites, the lowest average count noted was 3.5 bacteria CFU&amp;nbsp;m&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;, and the highest averaged 140.4 total CFU&amp;nbsp;m&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;. When atmospheric temperature allowed use, the high-volume liquid impinger utilized in this study resulted in much higher recoveries, as much as 10× greater in a number of the categories (bacterial, fungal, and total CFU). Together, these data illustrated that (1) the high-volume liquid impinger is clearly superior to membrane filtration for aeromicrobiology studies if start-up costs are not an issue and temperature permits use; (2) although membrane filtration is more cost friendly and has a ‘typically’ wider operational range, its limits include loss of cell viability with increased sample time and issues with effectively extracting nucleic acids for community-based analyses; (3) the ability to recover culturable microorganisms is limited in ‘extreme’ atmospheric environments and thus the use of a ‘limited’ methodology in these environments must be taken into account; and (4) the atmosphere culls, i.e., everything is not everywhere.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1007/s10453-010-9173-z</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Springer Link</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Observations on the use of membrane filtration and liquid impingement to collect airborne microorganisms in various atmospheric environments</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>