<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Miki Hondzo</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>J. W. Harvey</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>B.L. O’Connor</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2009</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Traditionally, dissolved oxygen (DO) fluxes have been calculated using the thin-film theory with DO microstructure data in systems characterized by fine sediments and low velocities. However, recent experimental evidence of fluctuating DO concentrations near the sediment-water interface suggests that turbulence and coherent motions control the mass transfer, and the surface renewal theory gives a more mechanistic model for quantifying fluxes. Both models involve quantifying the mass transfer coefficient (k) and the relevant concentration difference (??&lt;sub&gt;C&lt;/sub&gt;). This study compared several empirical models for quantifying k based on both thin-film and surface renewal theories, as well as presents a new method for quantifying ??&lt;sub&gt;C&lt;/sub&gt; (dynamic approach) that is consistent with the observed DO concentration fluctuations near the interface. Data were used from a series of flume experiments that includes both physical and kinetic uptake limitations of the flux. Results indicated that methods for quantifying k and ??&lt;sub&gt;C&lt;/sub&gt; using the surface renewal theory better estimated the DO flux across a range of fluid-flow conditions. ?? 2009 ASCE.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000093</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:title>Incorporating both physical and kinetic limitations in quantifying dissolved oxygen flux to aquatic sediments</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>