<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>R. B. Wanty</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Ridley W. Ian</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>P. J. Lamothe</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>B. A. Kimball</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>P. L. Verplanck</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>R.L. Runkel</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>D.M. Borrok</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2009</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Here the hydrogeochemical constraints of a tracer dilution study are combined with Fe and Zn isotopic measurements to pinpoint metal loading sources and attenuation mechanisms in an alpine watershed impacted by&amp;nbsp;acid mine drainage. In the tested mountain catchment,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;δ&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;56&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;Fe and&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;δ&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;66&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;Zn isotopic signatures of filtered stream water samples varied by ∼3.5‰ and 0.4‰, respectively. The inherent differences in the aqueous geochemistry of Fe and Zn provided complimentary isotopic information. For example, variations in&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;δ&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;56&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;Fe were linked to redox and precipitation reactions occurring in the stream, while changes in&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;δ&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;66&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;Zn were indicative of conservative mixing of different Zn sources.&amp;nbsp;Fen&amp;nbsp;environments contributed distinctively light dissolved Fe (&amp;lt;−2.0‰) and isotopically heavy suspended Fe precipitates to the watershed, while Zn from the fen was isotopically heavy (&amp;gt;+0.4‰). Acidic drainage from&amp;nbsp;mine wastes&amp;nbsp;contributed heavier dissolved Fe (∼+0.5‰) and lighter Zn (∼+0.2‰) isotopes relative to the fen.&amp;nbsp;Upwelling&amp;nbsp;of Fe-rich groundwater near the mouth of the catchment was the major source of Fe (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;δ&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;56&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;Fe&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;∼&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;0‰) leaving the watershed in surface flow, while runoff from&amp;nbsp;mining wastes&amp;nbsp;was the major source of Zn. The results suggest that given a strong framework for interpretation, Fe and Zn isotopes are useful tools for identifying and tracking metal sources and attenuation mechanisms in mountain watersheds.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.apgeochem.2009.03.010</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Application of iron and zinc isotopes to track the sources and mechanisms of metal loading in a mountain watershed</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>