<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>J. L. Tank</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>S. K. Hamilton</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>W. M. Wollheim</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>R. O. Hall Jr.</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>P. J. Mulholland</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>B. J. Peterson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>L. R. Ashkenas</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>L. W. Cooper</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Clifford N. Dahm</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>W. K. Dodds</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>N. B. Grimm</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>S. L. Johnson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>W. H. McDowell</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>G. C. Poole</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Valett H. Maurice</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>C. P. Arango</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>M. J. Bernot</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>A. J. Burgin</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>C. L. Crenshaw</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>A. M. Helton</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>L. T. Johnson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>J. M. O’Brien</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>J. D. Potter</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>R.W. Sheibley</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>D. J. Sobota</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>S. M. Thomas</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>J. J. Beaulieu</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2011</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div id="abstract-1" class="section abstract"&gt;&lt;div id="abstract-1" class="section abstract"&gt;&lt;p id="p-6"&gt;Nitrous oxide (N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O) is a potent greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change and stratospheric ozone destruction. Anthropogenic nitrogen (N) loading to river networks is a potentially important source of N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O via microbial denitrification that converts N to N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O and dinitrogen (N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;). The fraction of denitrified N that escapes as N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O rather than N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;(i.e., the N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O yield) is an important determinant of how much N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O is produced by river networks, but little is known about the N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O yield in flowing waters. Here, we present the results of whole-stream&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;15&lt;/sup&gt;N-tracer additions conducted in 72 headwater streams draining multiple land-use types across the United States. We found that stream denitrification produces N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O at rates that increase with stream water nitrate (NO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−&lt;/sup&gt;) concentrations, but that &amp;lt;1% of denitrified N is converted to N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O. Unlike some previous studies, we found no relationship between the N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O yield and stream water NO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−&lt;/sup&gt;. We suggest that increased stream NO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;loading stimulates denitrification and concomitant N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O production, but does not increase the N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O yield. In our study, most streams were sources of N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O to the atmosphere and the highest emission rates were observed in streams draining urban basins. Using a global river network model, we estimate that microbial N transformations (e.g., denitrification and nitrification) convert at least 0.68 Tg·y&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;of anthropogenic N inputs to N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O in river networks, equivalent to 10% of the global anthropogenic N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O emission rate. This estimate of stream and river N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O emissions is three times greater than estimated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p id="p-7"&gt;Humans have more than doubled the availability of fixed nitrogen (N) in the biosphere, particularly through the production of N fertilizers and the cultivation of N-fixing crops (&lt;a id="xref-ref-1-1" class="xref-bibr" href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-1" data-mce-href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-1"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;). Increasing N availability is producing unintended environmental consequences including enhanced emissions of nitrous oxide (N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O), a potent greenhouse gas (&lt;a id="xref-ref-2-1" class="xref-bibr" href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-2" data-mce-href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-2"&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;) and an important cause of stratospheric ozone destruction (&lt;a id="xref-ref-3-1" class="xref-bibr" href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-3" data-mce-href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-3"&gt;3&lt;/a&gt;). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates that the microbial conversion of agriculturally derived N to N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O in soils and aquatic ecosystems is the largest source of anthropogenic N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O to the atmosphere (&lt;a id="xref-ref-2-2" class="xref-bibr" href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-2" data-mce-href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-2"&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;). The production of N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O in agricultural soils has been the focus of intense investigation (i.e., &amp;gt;1,000 published studies) and is a relatively well constrained component of the N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O budget (&lt;a id="xref-ref-4-1" class="xref-bibr" href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-4" data-mce-href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-4"&gt;4&lt;/a&gt;). However, emissions of anthropogenic N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O from streams, rivers, and estuaries have received much less attention and remain a major source of uncertainty in the global anthropogenic N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O budget.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p id="p-8"&gt;Microbial denitrification is a large source of N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O emissions in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Most microbial denitrification is a form of anaerobic respiration in which nitrate (NO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−&lt;/sup&gt;, the dominant form of inorganic N) is converted to dinitrogen (N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;) and N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O gases (&lt;a id="xref-ref-5-1" class="xref-bibr" href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-5" data-mce-href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-5"&gt;5&lt;/a&gt;). The proportion of denitrified NO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;that is converted to N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O rather than N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;(hereafter referred to as the N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O yield and expressed as the mole ratio) partially controls how much N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O is produced via denitrification (&lt;a id="xref-ref-6-1" class="xref-bibr" href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-6" data-mce-href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-6"&gt;6&lt;/a&gt;), but few studies provide information on the N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O yield in streams and rivers because of the difficulty of measuring N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;and N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O production in these systems. Here we report rates of N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;and N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O production via denitrification measured using whole-stream&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;15&lt;/sup&gt;NO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−&lt;/sup&gt;-tracer experiments in 72 headwater streams draining different land-use types across the United States. This project, known as the second Lotic Intersite Nitrogen eXperiment (LINX II), provides unique whole-system measurements of the N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O yield in streams.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p id="p-9"&gt;Although N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O emission rates have been reported for streams and rivers (&lt;a id="xref-ref-7-1" class="xref-bibr" href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-7" data-mce-href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-7"&gt;7&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a id="xref-ref-8-1" class="xref-bibr" href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-8" data-mce-href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-8"&gt;8&lt;/a&gt;), the N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O yield has been studied mostly in lentic freshwater and marine ecosystems, where it generally ranges between 0.1 and 1.0%, although yields as high as 6% have been observed (&lt;a id="xref-ref-9-1" class="xref-bibr" href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-9" data-mce-href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-9"&gt;9&lt;/a&gt;). These N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O yields are low compared with observations in soils (0–100%) (&lt;a id="xref-ref-10-1" class="xref-bibr" href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-10" data-mce-href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-10"&gt;10&lt;/a&gt;), which may be a result of the relatively lower oxygen (O&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;) availability in the sediments of lakes and estuaries. However, dissolved O&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;in headwater streams is commonly near atmospheric equilibrium and benthic algal biofilms can produce O&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;at the sediment–water interface, resulting in strong redox gradients more akin to those in partially wetted soils. Thus, streams may have variable and often high N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O yields, similar to those in soils (&lt;a id="xref-ref-11-1" class="xref-bibr" href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-11" data-mce-href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-11"&gt;11&lt;/a&gt;). The N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O yield in headwater streams is of particular interest because much of the NO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;input to rivers is derived from groundwater upwelling into headwater streams. Furthermore, headwater streams compose the majority of stream length within a drainage network and have high ratios of bioreactive benthic surface area to water volume (&lt;a id="xref-ref-12-1" class="xref-bibr article-ref-popup hasTooltip" href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-12" data-hasqtip="4" data-mce-href="https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214#ref-12"&gt;12&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1073/pnas.1011464108</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Nitrous oxide emission from denitrification in stream and river networks</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>