<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Kenneth L. Krysko</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Douglas R. Mader</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Stephen J. Divers</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Robert N. Reed</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2014</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Why is there a section on introduced amphibians and reptiles in this volume, and why should veterinarians care about this issue? Globally, invasive species are a major threat to the stability of native ecosystems,&lt;sup&gt;1,2&lt;/sup&gt; and amphibians and reptiles are attracting increased attention as potential invaders. Some introduced amphibians and reptiles have had a major impact (e.g., Brown Tree Snakes [&lt;i&gt;Boiga irregularis&lt;/i&gt;] wiping out the native birds of Guam&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt; or Cane Toads [&lt;sup&gt;Rhinella marina&lt;/sup&gt;] poisoning native Australian predators).&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt; For the vast majority of species, however, the ecological, economic, and sociopolitical effects of introduced amphibians and reptiles are generally poorly quantified, largely because of a lack of focused research effort rather than because such effects are nonexistent. This trend is alarming given that rates of introduction have increased exponentially in recent decades.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/B978-1-4557-0893-2.00028-4</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Invasive and introduced reptiles and amphibians</dc:title>
  <dc:type>chapter</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>