<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Ross S. Stein</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Volkan Sevilgen</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Roland Burgmann</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Fred F. Pollitz</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2012</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Large earthquakes trigger very small earthquakes globally during passage of the seismic waves and during the following several hours to days&lt;sup&gt;1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10&lt;/sup&gt;, but so far remote aftershocks of moment magnitude &lt;i&gt;M&lt;/i&gt;&amp;ge;5.5 have not been identified&lt;sup&gt;11&lt;/sup&gt;, with the lone exception of an &lt;i&gt;M&lt;/i&gt;=6.9 quake remotely triggered by the surface waves from an &lt;i&gt;M&lt;/i&gt;=6.6 quake 4,800 kilometres away&lt;sup&gt;12&lt;/sup&gt;. The 2012 east Indian Ocean earthquake that had a moment magnitude of 8.6 is the largest strike-slip event ever recorded. Here we show that the rate of occurrence of remote &lt;i&gt;M&lt;/i&gt;&amp;ge;5.5 earthquakes (&gt;1,500 kilometres from the epicentre) increased nearly fivefold for six days after the 2012 event, and extended in magnitude to &lt;i&gt;M&lt;/i&gt;&amp;ge;7. These global aftershocks were located along the four lobes of Love-wave radiation; all struck where the dynamic shear strain is calculated to exceed 10&lt;sup&gt;-7&lt;/sup&gt; for at least 100 seconds during dynamic-wave passage. The other &lt;i&gt;M&lt;/i&gt;&amp;ge;8.5 mainshocks during the past decade are thrusts; after these events, the global rate of occurrence of remote &lt;i&gt;M&lt;/i&gt;&amp;ge;5.5 events increased by about one-third the rate following the 2012 shock and lasted for only two days, a weaker but possibly real increase. We suggest that the unprecedented delayed triggering power of the 2012 earthquake may have arisen because of its strike-slip source geometry or because the event struck at a time of an unusually low global earthquake rate, perhaps increasing the number of nucleation sites that were very close to failure.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1038/nature11504</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Nature Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>The 11 April 2012 east Indian Ocean earthquake triggered large aftershocks worldwide</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>