<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Geoffrey Blewitt</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Corne Kreemer</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jessica R. Murray-Moraleda</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jerry L. Svarc</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Craig M. dePolo</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Daphne D. LaPointe</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>William C. Hammond</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2011</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Using Global Positioning System (GPS) data from permanent sites and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) campaign data 
we have estimated co-seismic displacements and secular background crustal deformation patterns associated with the 21 
February 2008 Wells Nevada earthquake.  Estimated displacements at nearby permanent GPS sites ELKO (84 km distant) 
and GOSH (81 km distant) are 1.0±0.2 mm and 1.1±0.3 mm, respectively.  The magnitude and direction are in agreement 
with those predicted from a rupture model based on InSAR measurements of the near-field co-seismic surface 
displacement.  Analysis of long GPS time series (&gt;10 years) from the permanent sites within 250 km of the epicenter 
indicate the eastern Nevada Basin and Range undergoes steady tectonic transtension with rates on the order of 1 mm/year 
over approximately 250 km.  The azimuth of maximum horizontal crustal extension is consistent with the azimuth of the 
Wells earthquake co-seismic slip vector.  The orientation of crustal shear is consistent with deformation associated with 
Pacific/North America plate boundary relative motion seen elsewhere in the Basin and Range.  In response to the event, we 
deployed a new GPS site with the capability to telemeter high rate, low latency data that will in the future allow for rapid 
estimation of surface displacement should aftershocks or postseismic deformations occur.  We estimated co-seismic 
displacements using campaign GPS data collected before and after the event, however in most cases their uncertainties 
were larger than the offsets.  Better precision in co-seismic displacement could have been achieved for the campaign sites if 
they had been surveyed more times or over a longer interval to better estimate their pre-event velocity.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Global Positioning System constraints on crustal deformation before and during the 21 February 2008 Wells, Nevada M6.0 earthquake</dc:title>
  <dc:type>reports</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>