<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>F. Zareian</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>I. Iervolino</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>R.W. Graves</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>C. Galasso</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2012</dc:date>
  <dc:description>The study presented in this paper is among the first in a series of studies toward the engineering validation of the hybrid broadband ground‐motion simulation methodology by Graves and Pitarka (2010). This paper provides a statistical comparison between seismic demands of single degree of freedom (SDoF) systems subjected to past events using simulations and actual recordings. A number of SDoF systems are selected considering the following: (1) 16 oscillation periods between 0.1 and 6 s; (2) elastic case and four nonlinearity levels, from mildly inelastic to severely inelastic systems; and (3) two hysteretic behaviors, in particular, nondegrading–nonevolutionary and degrading–evolutionary. Demand spectra are derived in terms of peak and cyclic response, as well as their statistics for four historical earthquakes: 1979 &lt;i&gt;M&lt;sub&gt;w&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; 6.5 Imperial Valley, 1989 &lt;i&gt;M&lt;sub&gt;w&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; 6.8 Loma Prieta, 1992 &lt;i&gt;M&lt;sub&gt;w&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; 7.2 Landers, and 1994 &lt;i&gt;M&lt;sub&gt;w&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; 6.7 Northridge.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1785/0120120018</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Validation of ground-motion simulations for historical events using SDoF systems</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>