<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>R.Z. Poore</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>C. D. Reich</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>J. A. Flannery</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Christopher R. Maupin</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>T. M. Quinn</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>K. L. DeLong</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2010</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Paleoclimatologists have reconstructed century-long records of sea surface temperature (SST) in the Pacific using the Sr/Ca of massive corals, whereas similar reconstructions in the Atlantic have not proceeded at the same pace. Past research in the Florida Keys has focused on&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Montastrea spp.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;, an abundant and fast-growing massive coral, thus a good candidate for climate reconstructions. However, coral records from the Florida Keys are complicated by freshwater flux, which varies the Sr/Ca in seawater, thus confounding the Sr/Ca to SST signal. In this research, we compared the monthly Sr/Ca variations in three massive corals species (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Montastraea faveolata, Diploria strigosa, and Siderastrea siderea&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;) from the same reef in the nearly pristine Dry Tortugas National Park (24.70N, 82.80W) at the southwestern extent of the Florida Keys. This location is ideal for a calibration study as hourly water temperature records are available and the remote reef is far from mainland freshwater influence. These corals experienced the same environmental conditions (water depth, clarity, Sr/Ca of seawater, etc.) but differ in the mean annual growth rates (0.86 &amp;plusmn;0.10 (1&amp;sigma;) cm/year&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;M. faveolata&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;; 0.67 &amp;plusmn;0.04 (1&amp;sigma;) cm/year&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;D. strigosa&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;; 0.44 &amp;plusmn;0.04 (1&amp;sigma;) cm/year&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;S. siderea&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;). The mean Sr/Ca values are not the same but decrease with mean annual growth rates (9.201 &amp;plusmn;0.091 (1&amp;sigma;) mmol/mol&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;M. faveolata&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;; 9.177 &amp;plusmn;0.081 (1&amp;sigma;) mmol/mol&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;D. strigosa&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;; 8.964 &amp;plusmn;0.12 (1&amp;sigma;) mmol/mol&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;S. siderea&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;), thus supporting the &amp;ldquo;vital effect&amp;rdquo; or biological differences during calcification between coral species. The amplitude of the seasonal cycle in Sr/Ca varies with the slower growing&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;S. siderea&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;having the largest mean amplitude and&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;D. strigosa&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;the smallest (0.340 mmol/mol&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;S. siderea&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;; 0.284 mmol/mol&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;M. faveolata&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;; 0.238 mmol/mol&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;D. strigosa&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;). We confirmed our sampling methods by conducting several intracolony and intercolony coral Sr/Ca replication tests and found a high correlation in all tests (&amp;gt;0.95&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;S. siderea&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;; &amp;gt;0.90&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;D. strigosa&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;; &amp;gt;0.83&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;M. faveolata; p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt; 0.05). The weighted linear regression of monthly coral Sr/Ca to mean monthly SST revealed that&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;S. siderea&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;captured the seasonal and interannual variability in SST (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;r&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;= -0.97, -0.61 monthly and monthly anomalies, respectively,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt; 0.05). The other corals have reduced correlation with monthly anomalies and do not capture the seasonal variability with the same fidelity as&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;S. siderea&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;. All three corals were sampled along the thecal wall following the same procedures; however, each coral species has a different skeletal structure, density, and micro-scale growth patterns. We hypothesize the thecal wall of&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;S. siderea&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;calcifies at a continuous rate along the time-growth axis whereas the wall of&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;D. strigosa&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;M. faveolata&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;reflects a more complex signal. Of the three species, the slow growing&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;S. siderea&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;provides a robust reconstruction of mean monthly SST for the Dry Tortugas thus suitable for longer centennial-scale reconstructions.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>American Geophysical Union</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Do three massive coral species from the same reef record the same SST signal? A test from the Dry Tortugas, Florida Keys</dc:title>
  <dc:type>text</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>