<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Barnaby Watten</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Tim Pfeiffer</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>John Colt</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2012</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Based on conventional mass transfer models developed for oxygen, the use of the non-linear ASCE method, 2-point method, and one parameter linear-regression method were evaluated for carbon dioxide stripping data. For values of &lt;em&gt;K&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;L&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;a&lt;/em&gt;CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; &amp;lt; approximately 1.5/h, the 2-point or ASCE method are a good fit to experimental data, but the fit breaks down at higher values of &lt;em&gt;K&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;L&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;a&lt;/em&gt;CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;. How to correct &lt;em&gt;K&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;L&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;a&lt;/em&gt;CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; for gas phase enrichment remains to be determined. The one-parameter linear regression model was used to vary the C*&lt;sub&gt;CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/sub&gt; over the test, but it did not result in a better fit to the experimental data when compared to the ASCE or fixed C*&lt;sub&gt;CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/sub&gt; assumptions.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.aquaeng.2011.12.007</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Carbon dioxide stripping in aquaculture -- part III: model verification</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>