<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Joseph P. Schubauer-Berigan</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>William B. Richardson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Lynn Bartsch</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Peter E. Hughes</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Eric A. Strauss</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Rebecca M. Kreiling</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2013</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Restored riparian wetlands in the Upper Mississippi River basin have potential to remove sediment and nutrients from tributaries before they flow into the Mississippi River. For 3 yr we calculated retention efficiencies of a marsh complex, which consisted of a restored marsh and an adjacent natural marsh that were connected to Halfway Creek, a small tributary of the Mississippi. We measured sediment, N, and P removal through a mass balance budget approach, N removal through denitrification, and N and P removal through mechanical soil excavation. The marsh complex had average retention rates of approximately 30 Mg sediment ha&lt;sup&gt;&amp;minus;1&lt;/sup&gt; yr&lt;sup&gt;&amp;minus;1&lt;/sup&gt;, 26 kg total N ha&lt;sup&gt;&amp;minus;1&lt;/sup&gt; yr&lt;sup&gt;&amp;minus;1&lt;/sup&gt;, and 20 kg total P ha&lt;sup&gt;&amp;minus;1&lt;/sup&gt; yr&lt;sup&gt;&amp;minus;1&lt;/sup&gt;. Water flowed into the restored marsh only during high-discharge events. Although the majority of retention occurred in the natural marsh, portions of the natural marsh were hydrologically disconnected at low discharge due to historical over-bank sedimentation. The natural marsh removed &amp;gt;60% of sediment, &amp;gt;10% of P, and &amp;gt;5% of N loads (except the first year, when it was a N source). The marsh complex was a source of NH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt; and soluble reactive P. The average denitrification rate for the marsh complex was 2.88 mg N m&lt;sup&gt;&amp;minus;2&lt;/sup&gt; h&lt;sup&gt;&amp;minus;1&lt;/sup&gt;. Soil excavation removed 3600 Mg of sediment, 5.6 Mg of N, and 2.7 Mg of P from the restored marsh. The marsh complex was effective in removing sediment and nutrients from storm flows; however, retention could be increased if more water was diverted into both restored and natural marshes before entering the river.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.2134/jeq2012.0248</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>American Society of Agronomy</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Wetland management reduces sediment and nutrient loading to the upper Mississippi River</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>