<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Pamela J. Pietz</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Erik K. Hofmeister</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Alisa J. Bartos</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Marsha A. Sovada</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2013</dc:date>
  <dc:description>West Nile virus (WNV) causes significant mortality of American White Pelican chicks at northern plains colonies. We tested oropharyngeal/cloacal swabs from moribund chicks for shed WNV. Such shedding could enable chick-to-chick transmission and help explain why WNV spreads rapidly in colonies. WNV was detected on swabs from 11% of chicks in 2006 and 52% of chicks in 2007; however, viral titers were low. Before onset of WNV mortality, we tested blood from &lt; 3-week-old chicks for antibodies to WNV; 5% of chicks were seropositive, suggesting passive transfer of maternal antibodies. Among near-fledged chicks, 41% tested positive for anti-WNV antibodies, indicating that they survived infection. Among years and colonies, cumulative incidence of WNV in chicks varied from 28% to 81%, whereas the proportion of chicks surviving WNV (i.e., seropositive) was 64–75%. Our data revealed that WNV kills chicks that likely would fledge in the absence of WNV, that infection of chicks is pervasive, and that significant numbers of chicks survive infection.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.4269/ajtmh.12-0408</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>West nile virus in American white pelican chicks: transmission, immunity, and survival</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>