<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Carlos Mendoza</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Yuehua Zeng</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Stephen H. Hartzell</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2013</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;We independently invert teleseismic &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; waveforms and regional crustal phases to examine the finite fault slip model for the 2011 &lt;i&gt;M&lt;sub&gt;w&amp;nbsp;&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;5.8 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake. Theoretical and empirical Green's functions are used for the teleseismic and regional models, respectively. Both solutions show two distinct sources each about 2&amp;thinsp;km across and separated by 2.5&amp;thinsp;km. The source at the hypocenter is more localized in the regional model leading to a higher peak slip of 130&amp;thinsp;cm and higher average stress drop of 250 bars compared with 86&amp;thinsp;cm and 150 bars for the same source in the teleseismic model. Both sources are centered at approximately 8&amp;thinsp;km depth in the regional model, largely below the aftershock distribution. In the teleseismic model, the sources extend updip to approximately 6&amp;thinsp;km depth, into the depth range of the aftershocks. The rupture velocity is not well resolved but appears to be near 2.7&amp;thinsp;km/s.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1002/2013GL057880</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>American Geophysical Union</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Rupture model of the 2011 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake from teleseismic and regional waveforms</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>