<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Clifford I. Voss</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>C. E. Neuzil</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Alden M. Provost</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1998</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Results from a regional-scale ground-water flow model of the Fennoscandian shield 
suggest that ground-water flow is strongly affected by surface conditions associated 
with climatic change and glaciation. The model was used to run a series of numerical 
simulations of variable-density ground-water flow in a 1500-km-long and approximately 
10-km-deep cross-section that passes through southern Sweden. Ground-water flow and 
shield brine transport in the cross-sectional model are controlled by an assumed time 
evolution of surface conditions over the next 140 ka.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Simulations show that, under periglacial conditions, permafrost may locally or 
extensively impede the free recharge or discharge of ground water. Below cold-based 
glacial ice, no recharge or discharge of ground water occurs. Both of these conditions 
result in the settling of shield brine and consequent freshening of near-surface water in 
areas of natural discharge blocked by permafrost. The presence of warm-based ice with 
basal melting creates a potential for ground-water recharge rates much larger than 
under present, ice-free conditions. Recharging basal meltwater can reach depths of a 
few kilometers in a few thousand years. The vast majority of recharged water is 
accommodated through storage in the volume of bedrock below the local area of 
recharge; regional (lateral) redistribution of recharged water by subsurface flow is minor 
over the duration of a glacial advance (~10 ka). During glacial retreat, the weight of the 
ice overlying a given surface location decreases, and significant upward flow of ground 
water may occur below the ice sheet due to pressure release, despite the continued 
potential for recharge of basal meltwater. Excess meltwater must exit from below the 
glacier through subglacial cavities and channels. Subsurface penetration of meltwater 
during glacial advance and up-flow during glacial retreat are greatest if the loading 
efficiency of the shield rock is low. The maximum rate of ground-water discharge occurs 
at the receding ice margin, and some discharge occurs below incursive post-glacial seas.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The simulation results suggest that vertical movement of deep shield brines induced by 
the next few glacial cycles should not increase the concentration of dissolved solids 
significantly above present-day levels. However, the concentration of dissolved solids 
should decrease significantly at depths of up to several kilometers during periods of 
glacial meltwater recharge. The meltwater may reside in the subsurface for periods 
exceeding 10 ka and may bring oxygenated conditions to an otherwise reducing 
chemical environment.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Glaciation and regional ground-water flow in the Fennoscandian Shield: Site 94</dc:title>
  <dc:type>reports</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>