<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Diane L. Larson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Deborah L. Allan</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Peter H. Graham</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Elena Beyhaut</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2014</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Background and aims&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prairie restoration aims to create self-sustaining, resilient prairies that ameliorate biodiversity loss and soil deterioration associated with conversion of native grasslands to agriculture. Legumes are a key component of the nitrogen-limited prairie ecosystem. Evidence suggests that lack of suitable rhizobia may explain legume absence from restored prairies. This study explores effects of novel alternative inoculant delivery methods on: (a) prairie legume establishment, (b) soil biological properties, and (c) inoculant strain ability to nodulate the host over time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;br&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Methods&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alternative inoculation methods for seven legume species were tested in a replicated field experiment. Legume establishment, microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen, and rhizobial inoculant strain recovery were measured over a 3-year period.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;br&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Results&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Legume species richness in the second growing season was enhanced by a soil-applied granular clay inoculant, while seed-applied powdered peat inoculation was generally ineffective. When Dalea rhizobia were recovered 3-year after planting, only 2 % from the seed-applied inoculation treatment identified with the inoculant strains, whereas this amount ranged from 53 to 100 % in the other inoculation treatments. Some legumes established unexpectedly effective symbioses with strains not originally intended for them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;br&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Conclusions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Results provide new insights on inoculation of native legumes, especially when a mix of seeds is involved and the restoration targets harsh environments.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1007/s11104-013-1999-z</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Springer</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Legumes in prairie restoration: evidence for wide cross-nodulation and improved inoculant delivery</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>