<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Carrie L. Lowe</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Joseph D. Clark</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Kaitlin C. O'Connell-Goode</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2014</dc:date>
  <dc:description>The Louisiana black bear, Ursus americanus luteolus, is listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act as a result of habitat loss and human-related mortality. Information on population-level responses of large mammals to flooding events is scarce, and we had a unique opportunity to evaluate the viability of the Upper Atchafalaya River Basin (UARB) black bear population before and after a significant flooding event. We began collecting black bear hair samples in 2007 for a DNA mark-recapture study to estimate abundance (N) and apparent survival (φ). In 2011, the Morganza Spillway was opened to divert floodwaters from the Mississippi River through the UARB, inundating &gt; 50% of our study area, potentially impacting recovery of this important bear population. To evaluate the effects of this flooding event on bear population dynamics, we used a robust design multistate model to estimate changes in transition rates from the flooded area to non-flooded area (ψ&lt;sup&gt;F&lt;/sup&gt;→&lt;sup&gt;NF&lt;/sup&gt;) before (2007–2010), during (2010–2011) and after (2011–2012) the flood. Average N across all years of study was 63.2 (&lt;sub&gt;SE&lt;/sub&gt; = 5.2), excluding the year of the flooding event. Estimates of ψ&lt;sup&gt;F&lt;/sup&gt;→&lt;sup&gt;NF&lt;/sup&gt; increased from 0.014 (&lt;sub&gt;SE&lt;/sub&gt; = 0.010; meaning that 1.4% of the bears moved from the flooded area to non-flooded areas) before flooding to 0.113 (&lt;sub&gt;SE&lt;/sub&gt; = 0.045) during the flood year, and then decreased to 0.028 (&lt;sub&gt;SE&lt;/sub&gt;= 0.035) after the flood. Although we demonstrated a flood effect on transition rates as hypothesized, the effect was small (88.7% of the bears remained in the flooded area during flooding) and φ was unchanged, suggesting that the 2011 flooding event had minimal impact on survival and site fidelity.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1111/acv.12114</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Wiley</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Effects of a flooding event on a threatened black bear population in Louisiana</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>