<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Daniel L. Yule</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Thomas R. Hrabik</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Michael E. Sierszen</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Edmund J. Isaac</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Jason D. Stockwell</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2014</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;1.  We hypothesised that the autumn spawning migration of Lake Superior cisco (&lt;i&gt;Coregonus artedi&lt;/i&gt;) provides a resource subsidy, in the form of energy-rich cisco eggs, from the offshore pelagic to the nearshore benthic community over winter, when alternate prey production is likely to be low.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2.  We tested this hypothesis using fish and macroinvertebrate surveys, fish population demographics, diet and stable isotope analyses, and bioenergetics modelling.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3.  The benthic, congeneric lake whitefish (&lt;i&gt;C. clupeaformis&lt;/i&gt;) was a clear beneficiary of cisco spawning. Cisco eggs represented 16% of lake whitefish annual consumption in terms of biomass, but 34% of energy (because of their high energy density: &gt;10 kJ g wet mass&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;). Stable isotope analyses were consistent with these results and suggest that other nearshore fish species may also rely on cisco eggs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4.  The lipid content of lake whitefish liver almost doubled from 26 to 49% between November and March, while that of muscle increased from 14 to 26% over the same period, suggesting lake whitefish were building, rather than depleting, lipid reserves during winter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5.  In the other Laurentian Great Lakes, where cisco populations remain very low and rehabilitation efforts are underway, the offshore-to-nearshore ecological link apparent in Lake Superior has been replaced by non-native planktivorous species. These non-native species spawn in spring have smaller eggs and shorter incubation periods. The rehabilitation of cisco in these systems should reinstate the onshore subsidy as it has in Lake Superior.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1111/fwb.12340</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Wiley</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Habitat coupling in a large lake system: delivery of an energy subsidy by an offshore planktivore to the nearshore zone of Lake Superior</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>