<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Eric M. Thompson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>David M. Boore</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2014</dc:date>
  <dc:description>The stochastic method of ground‐motion simulation assumes that the energy in a target spectrum is spread over a duration D&lt;sub&gt;T&lt;/sub&gt;. D&lt;sub&gt;T&lt;/sub&gt; is generally decomposed into the duration due to source effects (D&lt;sub&gt;S&lt;/sub&gt;) and to path effects (D&lt;sub&gt;P&lt;/sub&gt;). For the most commonly used source, seismological theory directly relates D&lt;sub&gt;S&lt;/sub&gt; to the source corner frequency, accounting for the magnitude scaling of D&lt;sub&gt;T&lt;/sub&gt;. In contrast, D&lt;sub&gt;P&lt;/sub&gt; is related to propagation effects that are more difficult to represent by analytic equations based on the physics of the process. We are primarily motivated to revisit D&lt;sub&gt;T&lt;/sub&gt; because the function currently employed by many implementations of the stochastic method for active tectonic regions underpredicts observed durations, leading to an overprediction of ground motions for a given target spectrum. Further, there is some inconsistency in the literature regarding which empirical duration corresponds to D&lt;sub&gt;T&lt;/sub&gt;. Thus, we begin by clarifying the relationship between empirical durations and D&lt;sub&gt;T&lt;/sub&gt; as used in the first author’s implementation of the stochastic method, and then we develop a new D&lt;sub&gt;P&lt;/sub&gt; relationship. The new D&lt;sub&gt;P&lt;/sub&gt; function gives significantly longer durations than in the previous D&lt;sub&gt;P&lt;/sub&gt; function, but the relative contribution of D&lt;sub&gt;P&lt;/sub&gt; to D&lt;sub&gt;T&lt;/sub&gt; still diminishes with increasing magnitude. Thus, this correction is more important for small events or subfaults of larger events modeled with the stochastic finite‐fault method.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1785/0120140058</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Path durations for use in the stochastic‐method simulation of ground motions</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>