<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>R. Bruce Bury</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Wynn W. Cudmore</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2014</dc:date>
  <dc:description>We investigated the potential for resource partitioning between the Coastal giant salamander (&lt;i&gt;Dicamptodon tenebrosus&lt;/i&gt;) and the Cascade torrent salamander (&lt;i&gt;Rhyacotriton cascadae&lt;/i&gt;) by examining their diet and microhabitats in forest streams. Larval &lt;i&gt;D. tenebrosus&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;R. cascadae&lt;/i&gt; fed primarily upon aquatic insect larvae. We found similar foods in larval and adult &lt;i&gt;R. cascadae&lt;/i&gt; and combined these results. &lt;i&gt;Dicamptodon&lt;/i&gt; larvae consumed ephemeropteran, plecopteran, and trichopteran larvae in about equal amounts whereas &lt;i&gt;R. cascadae&lt;/i&gt; ate more trichopteran and less ephemeropteran larvae than &lt;i&gt;D. tenebrosus&lt;/i&gt;. Diet of all &lt;i&gt;R. cascadae&lt;/i&gt; overlapped more with smaller than larger sized &lt;i&gt;D. tenebrosus&lt;/i&gt; larvae. Comparisons of diets with available foods indicated &lt;i&gt;R. cascadae&lt;/i&gt; is more selective or more gape-limited in its feeding habits than &lt;i&gt;D. tenebrosus&lt;/i&gt; larvae. The two salamanders differed in use of microhabitats in creeks, which may contribute to their diet differences.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1674/0003-0031-172.1.191</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>University of Notre Dame</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Resource partitioning in two stream salamanders, Dicamptodon tenebrosus and Rhyacotriton cascadae, from the Oregon Cascade Mountains</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>