<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:date>2013</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;This assessment report presents the results of the 2013 AMAP 
Assessment of Arctic Ocean Acidification (AOA). This is the 
first such assessment dealing with AOA from an Arctic-wide 
perspective, and complements several assessments that AMAP 
has delivered over the past ten years concerning the effects of 
climate change on Arctic ecosystems and people.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP) is 
a group working under the Arctic Council. The Arctic Council 
Ministers have requested AMAP to:
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- produce integrated assessment reports on the status and 
trends of the conditions of the Arctic ecosystems;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- identify possible causes for the changing conditions;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- detect emerging problems, their possible causes, and the 
potential risk to Arctic ecosystems including indigenous 
peoples and other Arctic residents; and to&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- recommend actions required to reduce risks to 
Arctic ecosystems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This report provides the accessible scientific basis and validation 
for the statements and recommendations made in the &lt;i&gt;Arctic 
Ocean Acidification Assessment Summary for Policy-makers&lt;/i&gt;
that was delivered to Arctic Council Ministers at their meeting 
in Kiruna, Sweden in May 2011 and the related AMAP State 
of the &lt;i&gt;Arctic Environment report Arctic Ocean Acidification 
2013: An Overview&lt;/i&gt;
. It includes extensive background data and 
references to the scientific literature, and details the sources 
for figures reproduced in the overview report. Whereas the 
&lt;i&gt;Summary for Policy-makers&lt;/i&gt; report contains recommendations 
that focus mainly on policy-relevant actions concerned with 
addressing the consequences of AOA, the conclusions and 
recommendations presented in this report also cover issues 
of a more scientific nature, such as proposals for filling gaps 
in knowledge, and recommendations relevant to future 
monitoring and research work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The AOA assessment was conducted between 2010 and 2013 by 
an international group of over 60 experts. Lead authors were 
selected based on an open nomination process coordinated 
by AMAP. A similar process was used to select international 
experts who independently reviewed this report. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Information contained in this report is fully references and based on first and foremost peer-reviewed and published results of research and monitoring undertaken since 2006. It also incorporates some new (unpublished) information from monitoring and research conducted according to well-established and documented national and international standards of quality assurance/quality control protocols. Care has been taken to ensure that no critical probability statements are based on non-peer-reviewed materials.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Access to reliable and up-to-date information is essential for 
the development of science-based decision-making regarding 
ongoing changes in the Arctic and their global implications. The 
AOA assessment summary reports and films have therefore 
been developed specifically for policy-makers, summarizing the 
main findings of the AOA assessment. The AOA lead authors 
have confirmed that both this report and its derivative products 
accurately and fully reflect their scientific assessment. The 
AOA reports and the films are freely available from the AMAP 
Secretariat and on the AMAP website: www.amap.no, and their 
use for educational purposes is encouraged.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AMAP would like to express its appreciation to all experts who 
have contributed their time, efforts and data, in particular the 
lead authors who coordinated the production of this report. 
Thanks are also due to the reviewers who contributed to the 
AOA peer-review process and provided valuable comments 
that helped to ensure the quality of the report. A list of the 
main contributors is included at the start of each chapter. The 
list is not comprehensive. Specifically, it does not include the 
many national institutes, laboratories and organizations, and 
their staff, which have been involved in various countries in 
AOA-related monitoring and research. Apologies, and no lesser 
thanks are given to any individuals unintentionally omitted 
from the list.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The support from the Arctic countries and non-Arctic countries implementing research and monitoring in the Arctic is vital to the success of AMAP. The AMAP work is essentially based on ongoing activities within these countries, and the countries that provide the necessary support for most the experts involved in the preparation of the AMAP assessments. In particular, AMAP would like to acknowledge Norway for taking the lead-country role in this assessment and thank Canada, Norway, Sweden, USA and the Nordic Council of Ministers for their financial support to the AOA work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The AMAP Working Group is pleased to present its assessment 
to the Arctic Council and the international science community.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Richard Bellerby (AOA assessment Chair)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Russel Shearer (AMAP Chair)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lars-Otto Reiersen (AMAP Executive Secretary)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oslo, May 2013&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>AMAP Assessment 2013: Arctic Ocean acidification</dc:title>
  <dc:type>reports</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>