<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>John B. Bradford</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Robert A. Slesak</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Anthony W. D’Amato</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Valerie J. Kurth</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2014</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Contemporary forest management practices are increasingly designed to optimize novel objectives, such as maximizing biomass feedstocks and/or maintaining ecological legacies, but many uncertainties exist regarding how these practices influence forest carbon (C) cycling. We examined the responses of soil respiration (R&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt;) to biomass harvesting and green-tree retention in an effort to empirically assess their impacts on C cycling. We measured R&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt; and soil microclimatic variables over four growing seasons following implementation of these management practices using a fully replicated, operational-scale experiment in aspen-dominated forests in northern Minnesota. Treatments included three levels of biomass removal within harvested areas: whole-tree harvest (no slash deliberately retained), 20% slash retained, and stem-only harvest (all slash retained), and two levels of green-tree retention: 0.1 ha aggregate or none. The relative amount of biomass removed had a negligible effect on R&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt; in harvested areas, but treatment effects were probably obscured by heterogeneous slash configurations and rapid post-harvest regeneration of aspen in all of the treatments. Discrete measurements of R&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt; and soil temperature within green-tree aggregates were not discernible from surrounding harvested areas or unharvested control stands until the fourth year following harvest, when R&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt; was higher in unharvested controls than in aggregates and harvested stands. Growing season estimates of Rs showed that unharvested control stands had higher R&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt; than both harvested stands and aggregates in the first and third years following harvest. Our results suggest that retention of larger forest aggregates may be necessary to maintain ecosystem-level responses similar to those in unharvested stands. Moreover, they highlight the innate complexity of operational-scale research and suggest that the initial impacts of biomass harvest on R&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt; may be indiscernible from traditional harvest in systems where incidental breakage is high.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.052</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Initial soil respiration response to biomass harvesting and green-tree retention in aspen-dominated forests of the Great Lakes region</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>