<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Fritz L. Knopf</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>James A. Sedgwick</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1986</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Densities of, and potential nesting substrates for, cavity-nesting birds were examined in a mature plains cottonwood (&lt;i&gt;Populus sargentii&lt;/i&gt;) community in northeastern Colorado.  Although snag (dead tree) densities were low (0.66/ha), the cavity-nesting guild included 7 species with densities ≤ 463 birds/100 ha.  This finding suggests that cavity nesters are not limited by snag densities.  Most (94.2%) of the nest substrate for cavity-nesting birds was provided by live trees with large, dead limbs (≥ 10 cm in diam).  Both total dead limb length and the number of trees with dead limbs were highly correlated (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.001) with the number of cavities excavated.  Large trees (&gt;55 cm in diam at breast ht [dbh]) and dead limbs 15-30 cm in diameter were preferred for cavity excavation.  Because snags were a minor component of potential nest substrate, snag management may not be a useful concept for cavity-nesting birds in cottonwood bottomlands, and snag retention aspects of habitat models would be relatively unimportant for this forest type.  Live-tree management is recommended.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.2307/3801906</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Wildlife Society</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Cavity-nesting birds and the cavity-tree resource in plains cottonwood bottomlands</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>