<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Matthew L. Brooks</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jodie S. Holt</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Robin G. Marushia</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2012</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Invasive species researchers often ask: Why do some species invade certain habitats while others do not? Ecological theories predict that taxonomically related species may invade similar habitats, but some related species exhibit contrasting invasion patterns. &lt;i&gt;Brassica nigra&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Brassica tournefortii&lt;/i&gt;, and &lt;i&gt;Hirschfeldia incana&lt;/i&gt; are dominant, closely related nonnative species that have overlapping, but dissimilar, distributions. Brassica tournefortii is rapidly spreading in warm deserts of the southwestern United States, whereas &lt;i&gt;B. nigra&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;H. incana&lt;/i&gt; are primarily limited to semiarid and mesic regions. We compared traits of &lt;i&gt;B. tournefortii&lt;/i&gt; that might confer invasiveness in deserts with those of related species that have not invaded desert ecosystems. &lt;i&gt;Brassica tournefortii&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;B. nigra&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;H. incana&lt;/i&gt; were compared in controlled experiments conducted outdoors in a mesic site (Riverside, CA) and a desert site (Blue Diamond, NV), and in greenhouses, over 3 yr. Desert and mesic &lt;i&gt;B. tournefortii&lt;/i&gt; populations were also compared to determine whether locally adapted ecotypes contribute to desert invasion. Experimental variables included common garden sites and soil water availability. Response variables included emergence, growth, phenology, and reproduction. There was no evidence for &lt;i&gt;B. tournefortii&lt;/i&gt; ecotypes, but &lt;i&gt;B. tournefortii&lt;/i&gt; had a more rapid phenology than &lt;i&gt;B. nigra&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;H. incana&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;Brassica tournefortii&lt;/i&gt; was less affected by site and water availability than &lt;i&gt;B. nigra&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;H. incana&lt;/i&gt;, but was smaller and less fecund regardless of experimental conditions. Rapid phenology allows &lt;i&gt;B. tournefortii&lt;/i&gt; to reproduce consistently under variable, stressful conditions such as those found in Southwestern deserts. Although more successful in milder, mesic ecosystems, &lt;i&gt;B. nigra&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;H. incana&lt;/i&gt; may be limited by their ability to reproduce under desert conditions. Rapid phenology and drought response partition invasion patterns of nonnative mustards along a gradient of aridity in the southwestern United States, and may serve as a predictive trait for other potential invaders of arid and highly variable ecosystems.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1614/IPSM-D-11-00074.1</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Weed Science Society of America</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Phenology, growth, and fecundity as determinants of distribution in closely related nonnative taxa</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>