<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Katherine C. Kendall</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Harold D. Picton</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1994</dc:date>
  <dc:description>While past work concluded that thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was inadequate for the separation of grizzly (&lt;i&gt;Ursus arctos horribilis&lt;/i&gt;) and black bear (&lt;i&gt;U. americanus&lt;/i&gt;) scats, our study found differences adequate for species separation.  A key was constructed using 19 of 40 data points recorded on each(&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt;)=356 profiles of 178) know-species scat.  Accuracy was best for late summer scats (94%).  Methods for specimen preparation, analysis, and reading the TLC profiles are discussed.  Factors involved in scat variation were tested.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.2307/3872737</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>International Conference on Bear Research and Management</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Chromatographic (TLC) differentiation of grizzly bear and black bear scats</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>