<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Steve P. Rubin</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Reginald R. Reisenbichler</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Lisa A. Wetzel</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Michael C. Hayes</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2015</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Emigration was evaluated for hatchery Chinook salmon (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Oncorhynchus tshawytscha&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;) microjacks (age-1 mature males) and immature parr (age-1 juveniles, both sexes) released from both a hatchery and a natural stream (fish released as fry). In the hatchery, volitional releases (&amp;sim;14 to 15 months post-fertilization) to an adjacent river occurred during October&amp;ndash;November. The hatchery release was monitored by using an experimental volitional release that diverted fish to a neighboring raceway. Fish captured during the experimental release (range 361&amp;ndash;4,321 volitional migrants) were made up of microjacks and immature parr. Microjacks were found only in the migrant samples, averaged 18% (range 0&amp;ndash;52%) of all migrants, and were rarely found in non-migrant samples. In comparison, immature parr were common in both the migrant and non-migrant samples. Microjacks were significantly longer (9%), heavier (36%), and had a greater condition factor (16%) than migrant immature parr (P&amp;lt;0.01). In addition, they differed significantly (P&amp;lt;0.01) from non-migrant immature parr; 10% longer, 44% heavier and 14% greater condition factor. In natural streams, microjacks were captured significantly earlier (P&amp;lt;0.01) than immature parr during the late-summer/fall migration and comprised 9&amp;ndash;89% of all fish captured. Microjacks have the potential to contribute to natural spawning populations but can also represent a loss of productivity to hatchery programs or create negative effects by introducing non-native genes to wild populations and should be monitored by fishery managers.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.3996/022014-JFWM-013</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Migratory behavior of Chinook salmon microjacks reared in artificial and natural environments</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>