<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Richard Di Rocco</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Cowan Belanger</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Grant Brown</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Nicholas S. Johnson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>István Imre</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2014</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Using semi‐natural enclosures, this study investigated (1) whether adult sea lamprey&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Petromyzon marinus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;show avoidance of damage‐released conspecific cues, damage‐released heterospecific cues and predator cues and (2) whether this is a general response to injured heterospecific fishes or a specific response to injured&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P. marinus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;. Ten replicate groups of 10 adult&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P. marinus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;, separated by sex, were exposed to one of the following nine stimuli: deionized water (control), extracts prepared from adult&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P. marinus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;, decayed adult&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P. marinus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;(conspecific stimuli), sympatric white sucker&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Catostomus commersonii&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;, Amazon sailfin catfish&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Pterygoplichthys pardalis&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;(heterospecific stimuli), 2‐phenylethylamine (PEA HCl) solution, northern water snake&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Nerodia sipedon&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;washing, human saliva (predator cues) and an adult&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P. marinus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;extract and human saliva combination (a damage‐released conspecific cue and a predator cue). Adult&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P. marinus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;showed a significant avoidance response to the adult&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P. marinus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;extract as well as to&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;C. commersonii&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;, human saliva, PEA and the adult&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P. marinus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;extract and human saliva combination. For mobile&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P. marinus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;, the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;N. sipedon&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;washing induced behaviour consistent with predator inspection. Exposure to the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P. pardalis&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;extract did not induce a significant avoidance response during the stimulus release period. Mobile adult female&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P. marinus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;showed a stronger avoidance behaviour than mobile adult male&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P. marinus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;in response to the adult&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P. marinus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;extract and the adult&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P. marinus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;extract and human saliva combination. The findings support the continued investigation of natural damage‐released alarm cue and predator‐based repellents for the behavioural manipulation of&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P. marinus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;populations in the Laurentian Great Lakes.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1111/jfb.12374</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Wiley</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>The behavioural response of adult Petromyzon marinus to damage-released alarm and predator cues</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>