<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Adam K. Janke</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Michael J. Anteau</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Aaron T. Pearse</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Anthony D. Fox</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Johan Elmberg</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jacob N. Straub</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Michael W. Eichholz</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Celine Arzel</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Joshua D. Stafford</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2014</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Spring migration is a key part of the annual cycle for waterfowl populations in the&amp;nbsp;northern hemisphere, due to its temporal proximity to the breeding season and&amp;nbsp;because resources may be limited at one or more staging sites. Research based on field&amp;nbsp;observations during spring lags behind other periods of the year, despite the potential&amp;nbsp;for fitness consequences through diminished survival or cross-seasonal effects of&amp;nbsp;conditions experienced during migration. Consequently, conservation strategies for&amp;nbsp;waterfowl on spring migration are often only refined versions of practices used&amp;nbsp;during autumn and winter. Here we discuss the current state of knowledge of habitat&amp;nbsp;requirements for waterfowl at their spring migratory sites and the intrinsic and&amp;nbsp;extrinsic factors that lead to variability in those requirements. The provision of plant&amp;nbsp;foods has become the main conservation strategy during spring because of the birds&amp;rsquo;&amp;nbsp;energy requirements at this time, not only to fuel migration but to facilitate early&amp;nbsp;clutch formation on arrival at the breeding grounds. Although energy sources are&amp;nbsp;important to migrants, there is little evidence on the extent to which the availability&amp;nbsp;of carbohydrate-based food is limiting for many migratory waterfowl populations. &amp;nbsp;Such limitation is relatively unlikely among populations that exploit agricultural grain&amp;nbsp;during migration (e.g. arctic-nesting geese), suggesting that conservation strategies for&amp;nbsp;these populations may be misplaced. In general, however, we found few cases in&amp;nbsp;which an ecological understanding of spring-migrating waterfowl was sufficient to&amp;nbsp;indicate true resource limitation during migration, and still fewer cases where&amp;nbsp;conservation efforts ameliorated these limitations. We propose a framework that aims&amp;nbsp;to address knowledge gaps and apply empirical research results to conservation&amp;nbsp;strategies based on documented limitations and associated fitness impacts on&amp;nbsp;migrating waterfowl. Such a strategy would improve allocation of scarce&amp;nbsp;conservation resources during spring migration and greatly improve ecological&amp;nbsp;understanding of migratory waterfowl and their habitats in the northern hemisphere.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Wildfowl Trust</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Spring migration of waterfowl in the Northern Hemisphere: a management and conservation perspective</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>