<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Andrew J. Michael</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2014</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;The International Seismological Centre, in collaboration with the Global Earthquake Model effort, has released a new global earthquake catalog, covering the time period from 1900 through the end of 2009. In order to use this catalog for global earthquake studies, I determined the magnitude of completeness (&lt;i&gt;M&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;) as a function of time by dividing the earthquakes shallower than 60 km into 7 time periods based on major changes in catalog processing and data availability and applying 4 objective methods to determine &lt;i&gt;M&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, with uncertainties determined by non-parametric bootstrapping. Deeper events were divided into 2 time periods. Due to differences between the 4 methods, the final &lt;i&gt;M&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;was determined subjectively by examining the features that each method focused on in both the cumulative and binned magnitude frequency distributions. The time periods and &lt;i&gt;M&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; values for shallow events are: 1900-1917, &lt;i&gt;M&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;=7.7; 1918-1939, &lt;i&gt;M&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;=7.0; 1940-1954, &lt;i&gt;M&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;=6.8; 1955-1963, &lt;i&gt;M&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;=6.5; 1964-1975, &lt;i&gt;M&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;=6.0; 1976-2003, &lt;i&gt;M&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;=5.8; and 2004-2009, &lt;i&gt;M&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;=5.7. Using these &lt;i&gt;M&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; values for the longest time periods they are valid for (e.g. 1918-2009, 1940-2009,&amp;hellip;) the shallow data fits a Gutenberg-Richter distribution with &lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;=1.05 and &lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;=8.3, within 1 standard deviation, with no declustering. The exception is for time periods that include 1900-1917 in which there are only 33 events with &lt;strong&gt;M&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;ge; &lt;i&gt;M&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; and for those few data &lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;=2.15&amp;plusmn;0.46. That result calls for further investigations for this time period, ideally having a larger number of earthquakes. For deep events, the results are &lt;i&gt;M&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;=7.1 for 1900-1963, although the early data are problematic; and &lt;i&gt;M&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;=5.7 for 1964-2009. For that later time period, &lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;=0.99 and &lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;=7.3.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1785/0120130227</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>How complete is the ISC-GEM Global Earthquake Catalog?</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>